This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject AfroCreatives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of AfroCreatives articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfroCreativesWikipedia:WikiProject AfroCreativesTemplate:WikiProject AfroCreativesAfroCreatives articles
I've been steadily fixing this article since it first appeared in an error category and some of the subsequent edits by other editors don't make a lot of sense. One of the fixes involved bringing the tables up to required standards by applying MOS:BOLD, MOS:CAPS, MOS:ACCESS/MOS:DTT and formatting the team tables so they looked the same. However, this unexplained edit removed the formatting so the columns were no longer aligned. I reverted, but was reverted with the summary "The Contestants tables look better".[1] Can somebody please explain how misaligning the table columns makes the tables look "better"? For the record, throughout the TV project we try to align tables where possible as this has been raised at WP:GA nominations. Articles have been criticised where similar tables are misaligned and correct alignment was seen necessary to meet requirements for a good article. There's actually no reason why these tables can't be combined. --AussieLegend (✉) 19:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]