Talk:Surveyor 2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Surveyor 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Surveyor 2 repeated

There's something wrong with this article, it does not read correctly. It starts by discussing Surveyor 2 and the timings of its mission and crash. Then it talks about an apparent successor also called Surveyor 2 with its timings. I don't know the facts, could someone correct this please? Colin99 19:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the second paragraph. It was largely a duplicate, and the extra detail it contained seemed to me excessive. Lancevortex (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading picture

All Surveyor articles use the same photo of a Surveyor craft. In all atricles it should clearly be stated that the craft pictured is a different Surveyor craft than the one discussed in the article.

It is especially misleading in this article since Surveyor 2 crashed on the surface of the moon, but the picture shows a properly landed craft standing on the surface of the moon.

The impact velocity

Is likely to be higher than lunar escape velocity (5300 mph), and indeed I found a reference that said "nearly 6000 mph," which is similar to the Ranger impact velocities. The previous reference in the article ("1500 mph") was to a news article, and the reporter doesn't give his source or reasoning. The only possibility for a slower impact than escape velocity that the retrorocket, which was ignited, had slowed the craft. However, since it was tumbling, this rocket was as likely to speed it up as to slow it down. In any case, all contact was lost once the retro was ignited, so I don't think anybody knows exactly how fast the craft was going when it did hit. I've changed it to the more believable figure until somebody can get me a better reference. S B H arris 03:40, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bad link

The Surveyor 2 flight performance final report link is dead.

   69.72.27.231 (talk) 18:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Surveyor 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100207072958/http://boeing.com/defense-space/space/bss/factsheets/scientific/surveyor/surveyor.html to http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/bss/factsheets/scientific/surveyor/surveyor.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]