Talk:Surface warfare

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

Is there some page that consolidates a list of the different classes of surface ships, and their general use? I've looked through the individual articles on Cruiser, Battleships, Frigates, and whatnot, but there doesn't seem to be any sort of cross-reference available.

fourth class of naval warfare?

Should Littoral be added as a fourth? There is already an article on Littoral combat ships. Debivort 20:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Anti-surface warfare into Surface warfare

Oppose While the title Anti-surface warfare precisely defines the content, the Surface warfare is too broad (no need to duplicate most of the existing Naval warfare, which is only slightly more broad in terms of definition). In my opinion it is the Surface warfare that should be merged to Naval warfare, and Anti-surface warfare left alone. --Kubanczyk (talk) 22:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]