Talk:Surbiton Lagoon

Swimming Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Depth of pool

9' is not very deep at all. My memory says 12'. We could do with ratification of these figures please. Fiddle Faddle 10:02, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Come to think of it, When I was a little kid the 3' at Epsom baths was comfortable, but the shallow end at the lagoon made me stand on tiptoe. I have a feeling of 3'6" more than 3' Real data anyone? Attributable? Fiddle Faddle 11:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i dont care how deep it was, i had really good times there and miss it a lot, whoever made the bad decision to close it was very short sighted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.112.77.58 (talk) 21:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty sure it was 9'. Too shallow to dive from the top board, jut jumping was safe enough. Bath No1 at Kingston Swimming Baths, aka Coronation Baths, was 10', but Bath No2 was only 8' and did not have diving boards. Richard Austin 17/1/2015.

Depth of pool

Categories