Talk:Sura (film)/Archive 1

Archive 1

it is the remake film or? no it is not remake.

Sura budget

Sura's budget is really 60 crores ???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rouben22 (talk • contribs) 15:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

There is no official confirmation from the SUN PICTURES on the budget and sale of this movie with direct quotes from the producers. If so kindly provide before any modifications are madeRationalefacts (talk) 18:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Unacceptable comment

Can some biased fans keep away from wikipedia? If you want to post your opinions please choose the fan site of Vijay, do not spoil the wiki.

Anyone is allowed to edit as long as they attempt to follow Wikipedia's guidelines, which include:

• WP:V - content must be verifiable, cite your sources, the sources must be reliable, - i.e. not blogs or fansites

  WP:NPOV - content must be presented in a neutral point of view (ie if you are a fan, keep your gushing to your webpage, not here)

  WP:AGF - assume good faith, that your fellow editors are here to improve the encyclopedia

  WP:NPA - no personal attacks - talk about content and not the editors

Also, please sign your comments on talk pages. You can sign using 4 of: ~

207.69.139.155 (talk) 03:08, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

The person with IP 116.68.94.223 is posting wrong details confusing the readers. Many of these are writing their own version of Box office collections when hardly any distributor has come out in public. Wiki moderators please take note ~Rationalefacts

Edit requested

{{editsemiprotected}} Please add a: =References = {reflist} section to the article. Thanks! 207.69.139.146 (talk) 16:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Done Thanks, Celestra (talk) 17:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Oneindia does not appear to meet reliable source requirements

The first line on the disclaimer page http://www.oneindia.in/disclaimer.shtml "We are not responsible for any errors, omissions or representations on any of our pages or on any links on any of our pages." does not appear to meet reliable source requirements. If there is not an editorial board reviewing the content to the point that they stand behind their facts, I dont think we should trust them. -- The Red Pen of Doom 04:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Db2658, 29 May 2010 for improving this article

{{editsemiprotected}}

Db2658 (talk) 14:50, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Not done: Welcome and thanks for wanting to improve this article. The editsemiprotected template allows non-autoconfirmed users to edit a semiprotected article using an autoconfirmed fellow editor as a proxy. It requires a specific request with a 'please change X to Y' degree of detail and reliable sources for any factual changes. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 15:42, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Protect the page

Protect page from the vandalism SundarRamasamy029 (talk) 04:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)