Talk:Supreme Court of Korea

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Supreme Court of Korea article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Korea Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

Started the article. You might not want to link to it yet, since it's still a (very) rough draft. Also, I would appreciate any help anyone would like to give. Cheers. --Zonath 04:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nice job. in case you haven't seen this yet: http://countrystudies.us/south-korea/63.htm. Appleby 16:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meaning of "without power of judicial review"

I'm sensing a recurring theme throughout this Wikipedia article where the Supreme Court is described as not having the power of judicial review. My best guess is that this is a translation of the Korean word 사법권. Nevertheless, they both mean, quite literally, the ability to review the legality of cases brought to court (including government actions), which wouldn't make sense for the Supreme Court not to have. I'm not a modern Korean history expert, so I don't know if the first constitution of Korea drastically limited the Supreme Court's power of judicial review, so if that's the case, please explicitly state which part of judicial review was limited in the article. In the meantime, I will be looking over the article and removing all out-of-place mention of "power of judicial review".

My working theory is that it was meant to be the power of constitutional review, which is related to judicial review but not every court has it. I think we should make the distinction between the two very clear, as it can be extremely confusing if they're conflated. I'll be cleaning up the article a bit in the coming weeks but, my fellow Wikipedians, I urge you: Please avoid using the two interchangeably Jourdy345 (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]