Talk:Supreme Court Historical Society

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

very skimpy

Please, provide information as to what this lot is up to; inquiring minds want to know. 172.75.173.194 (talk) 03:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See-alsos unrelated to Supreme Court Historical Society

The Controversies section has {{see also}} links to Presidency of Donald Trump#Ethics and Clinton Foundation#Controversies. I don't see any documented connections. The edit summary which added these is linking to two other similar ethics controversies. Which seems odd to me. Absent any connection to the linked see-also articles, why not link to a thousand other influence controversies?

I'm inclined to remove these, as well as the complementary set of see-also links added to the Clinton Foundation article.

But even though I am quibbling about these links, a shout-out to @Superb Owl, who did so much good work on this article. -- M.boli (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@M.boli - thanks for the shoutout and I'm curious to hear what others think.
I first looked for an article that gives an overview of these types of conflict-of-interest controversies (accepting donations or doing business as a prominent elected official) and ideally there's a generic article destination that would help avoid the arbitrariness of picking out examples, when there are countless others (though maybe not as prominent of examples in modern American politics) Superb Owl (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]