Talk:Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973
 | Supply of Goods (Implied Terms) Act 1973 has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 5, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that two sections of the British 1973 Sale of Goods Act were completely identical? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Up to date?
[edit]I should have perhaps just said "mostly replaced" in my changes. Here's the up to date link.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1973/13/contents
Most of the article is about the removed sections, with one paragraph at the end on hire purchase. It also reads in the present tense, like this: "The Act is designed to prevent the avoidance of implied terms through exclusion clauses. It provides (in Section 4) that any attempt to exclude a seller in consumer sales from Sections 2 and 3 is void." Should this all be changed? Wikidea 13:27, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- I'll amend that in a sec, then, sure. Ironholds (talk) 13:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC)