Talk:Supernatural season 12

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Procedural close This move does not need discussion. Only a technical request is necessary, as indicated by PC78.(non-admin closure). AussieLegend (✉) 07:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noting that the request has now been made.[1] --AussieLegend (✉) 07:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Supernatural (12 season) → Supernatural (season 12) – Technical: correct name, as for other seasons. Anyway, I tried to move it manually but, it was not possible (although the page had a single edit, now two for the redirect to this page). --Dэя-Бøяg 03:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Seems like a technical request rather than something that requires discussion. PC78 (talk) 01:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Edit warring over season color

47.203.75.226 and LLArrow, can you please stop edit warring over the season color. You guys have reverted each other five times with zero discussion. Reverting without explanation isn't helpful and can just get you blocked. The color was changed by S hannon434 after they added the poster art, and that color is perfectly acceptable: it's a color from the poster and more importantly, is compliant per WP:COLOR. LLArrow, you changed the color because you think it's more reflective and that it's somehow "official". The fact is, there is no "official" color and both colors do work perfectly fine; but, in MOS:TV, it states "Once established, colors that meet WP:COLOR should not be changed arbitrarily without discussion (see WP:DEW)". A color was chosen, it's compliant and it matches the artwork. Please stop edit warring. Drovethrughosts (talk) 21:34, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LLArrow started first plus that user is a total bully. I was just going back to where it was in the first place. 47.203.75.226 (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Classic IP deflection. The color is to contrast the previous season and mimic the overall theme of the season poster. This dark brown accomplishes both. @Drovethrughosts: would you mind reporting this IP for edit warring. They are doing so on many articles, not following the proper procedures and forcing their opinion. I'd do so myself but am currently swamped in non-Wikipedia life. LLArrow (talk) 01:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LLArrow, stop being a bitch and quit your whining about the season color right now. I have had it with you're nonstop excuses. Since I updated this season, all you do is just bicker and dictat the color I had in the first place. Let 47.203.75.226 change it back to where it was in the first place. As Drovethrughosts said, it matches the artwork and it is also a complaint. If you keep doing this or continue to harass one another, you might as well face a ton of consequences.S hannon434 (talk) 04:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@S hannon434: Threats? Interesting. LLArrow (talk) 07:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@LLArrow: You really need to stop edit warring with 47.203.75.226 over the color. You also need to stop threatening other editors with statements such as "Stop edit warring or face block" in edit summaries. You're doing the exact same thing, do you somehow feel you're exempt from the edit warring? I'm surprised you're so brazen with your edit warring/reverts after your latest block where you were warned that further editing warring could result in an indefinite block. I've already pointed to the guideline in MOS:TV about changing colors arbitrarily without discussion, and that's what you're doing here. So, I suggest just move on; not everything can go your way. Any further reverts and I will make a report to the edit warring noticeboard, and I don't think you'd want that. Focus on more constructive editing, as I know you're capable of that. Drovethrughosts (talk) 22:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Drovethrughosts: back the hell off of me. This IP is a multiple offender of policy on Wikipedia and they never make constructive edits. I have enough stress in my life without you badgering me over something others are just as guilty of. Not to mention the fact that you're completely ignoring all the positive edits I make on a daily basis. Honestly I am sick to $h!t of this treatment, and I'm not going to take it any longer. LLArrow (talk) 23:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@LLArrow: If you don't want extra stress on Wikipedia, then I suggest stop edit warring with people and just learn to move on. If you learn to collaborate with people and not be at odds with everyone all the time, editing can be an enjoyable experience. Just some friendly advice. Also, just because you make also positive edits doesn't give you the right to consistency revert another editor without explanation or discussion, regardless if they're an IP editor or not. The IP is edit warring too, but again, you're still changing colors arbitrarily without discussion or consensus, which is right in MOS:TV, a guideline. Why do you feel your opinion is always more valid than others? It's exactly what you're doing here. What's happening here is nothing different than what happened on American Horror Story: Asylum regarding the proposed color change. Your exact words in an edit summary, "Do not change agreed upon colours without taking it to the Talk page and gaining a consensus to do so". So, clearly, if it's a color you choose (or like), it's good; but if someone else changes it, it's wrong. That's a clear WP:OWN problem, among other things. Drovethrughosts (talk) 10:51, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Drovethrughosts: I never claimed Wikipedia was my source of stress, it just adds to it exponentially, due in large-part to chip-on-their-shoulder editors like you're turning out to be. Rather than do something extraordinarily constructive like report this horrendously bad IP for their countless violations, you choose to engage in a firefight with me; an editor that has worked tirelessly on Wikipedia for hours and years. Sure I may not always be in the right, but someone has got to fight for what's right when no one else will. I will not further engage in this ludicrous, double-standardized discussion until this IP is banned or blocked. Good day, LLArrow (talk) 21:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@LLArrow: I'm still confused how you think the IP should be blocked but not you, when you're both doing the exact same thing: consistently edit warring without discussion. The IP is restoring the original color chosen and it shouldn't be changed arbitrarily without consensus per MOS:TV. I don't get why you think you're exempt from following guidelines. What are you "fighting"? Wikipedia is not a battleground, you're not reverting vandalism here, you're arguing about a color for a TV show (WP:DEW). Hopefully you can move on now. Drovethrughosts (talk) 21:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Drovethrughosts: I see you completely overlooked/deny the double standard labeling. Which this is. I said, I'm done. Go witch-hunt someone else. LLArrow (talk) 22:16, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]