Talk:Supernatural Horror in Literature

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Supernatural Horror in Literature be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Reverted edit

I just reverted an edit by User:Randy Kryn from 28 March 2015‎, for which he claimed as justification, "Essays are italic on Wikipedia." This only reveals his ignorance of Wikipedia policy regarding italicized titles, as delineated at MOS:NOITALIC, which I quote:

Italics are generally used only for titles of longer works. Titles of shorter works should be enclosed in double quotation marks[...] This particularly applies to works that exist as a smaller part of a larger work. These include but are not limited to: Articles, essays, papers[...]

This is my justification for reverting the edit. The subject of the article is an essay that was published in a magazine, has been repeatedly collected in anthologies, and which has never been published as a pamphlet or a standalone work. 207.155.212.66 (talk) 01:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and yes, I was wrong. Look at the date: almost exactly a year ago. I've learned a lot about italics since. Thank you for catching this. Hopefully I didn't make too many mistakes like this back then, I think I usually checked for a stand-alone publication so missed this one, and thanks again. Randy Kryn 1:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Here's one you can maybe help me out on, 207.155.212.66. Some pages have incorrectly italicized titles, such as The Four Diamonds which I've just come across, because they also have a film infobox lower on the page. I've never figured out how to unitalicize something like that. DISPLAYTITLE doesn't work. Maybe it's an easy fix, I have no idea. Thanks. Randy Kryn 2:08, 29 March 2016 (UTC)