Talk:Superman: True Brit

Comics: British / DC Comics / Superman Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by British comics work group.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Superman work group.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Favourable Review

The favourable review link is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.252.72 (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Point of View

Can some kind soul who has read the book check my writing for point of view. I've tried my best to remain neutral, though it would help if someone could suggest some favourable valid praise for the book to contrast those currently listed. Crispin Giles 13:46, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the book, and you've done fine. I wouldn't worry about neutrality, as a majority of writers here never follow NPOV anyway, and you just have to look at the accusations of hypocrissy made against me for pointing out a criticism of the Teen Titans animated series. Crablogger 12:59, 11 June 2007 (GMT)

That's terrible advice. Just because someone hurt your feelings doesn't mean the rules go out the window. Some guy 07:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Supbrit.jpg

Image:Supbrit.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]