Talk:Superfinalen

Superfinalen was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 19, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
March 13, 2019	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Norway

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Football

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles

Merge with Superfinalen 2009

Do we really need a separate article about the one game that has been played in this competition and is the one game notable in itself? I'm proposing ti merge the info from Superfinalen 2009 into this article. Rettetast (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - At the minute, it seems like the project is only in its early stages. However, if another match is played in 2010, and there are prospects for it to become an annual thing, then I would not be opposed to re-splitting the info. – Pee Jay 10:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Superfinalen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:33, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:33, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

"There have previously been attempts at pre-season friendlies between the reigning league and cup champions, but Superfinalen was the first attempt to make it an official tournament. Such a super cup is common between the domestic league and cup winners in many European countries." Providing a couple examples here in both cases would be beneficial.
- As for previous attempts, the source does not state anything specific. I've added a source which mentions the pre-season friendly between Viking and Rosenborg, which is all I've been able to identify. Again, it was not an official tournament, it was just "by accident" that the two played each others. I've added Charity Shield as an example, although I'm not that happy with have one-of-many examples (nearly all European countries have a super cup, so why mention Charity Shield specifically?). Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'd move the aspects of the cancellation into a new section after 2010 and expand a bit on that. If it was as simple as it sounds though there's probably not much extra to add. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Beyond the coverage of the two actual matches, there is very little written about this tournament in the press. In particular after the tournament was canceled the one article I found was the only mention. With the article this short, there is little more to say, except adding additional match details, which would be best suited for the two sub-articles. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just those couple things: article's on hold, will pass when done. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:10, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm on vacation now, so I've don't have much time to do much on Wikipedia until the weekend. Hope it's fine that I wait with looking into this until then. Thanks for the review, anyway. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:49, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's alright, this can wait a few days. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I can keep this on hold for another week, but would rather not go further than that if I didn't have to. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review and letting it wait a week. I've seen to your comments. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

This article has been redirected. Redirects can not be Good articles so I am delisting it. AIRcorn (talk) 11:19, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]