Talk:Super Robot Wars XO/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 15:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Immediate Failures
[edit]It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
-It contains copyright infringements
-It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}).
-It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.
-
Links
[edit]Prose
[edit]Lede
[edit]- Part of the company's Super Robot Wars series - better would be to say which entry in the Super Robot Wars series it is. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- I had considered doing that while writing this. Ultimately, I chose not to, as there's an incredible amount of Super Robot Wars games that writing something like "The twenty-sixth installment" didn't sit well with me.
- is Super Robot Wars GC not notable? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Probably not. Frankly I haven't done an in-depth search like I did with this game, but all I could find at first glance was a GameSpot preview. I will consider making a page if there's more coverage.
- They aren't "installments", they are games in a series. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- I've seen the word "installments" be used many times to discuss an entry in a game series, so I don't think it's necessarily incorrect. I can still change it if you insist it doesn't belong there. Namcokid47 23:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- increased hardware capabilities and online support - increased from what? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
General
[edit]- is it a "fleet of mechas" as per lede, or "fleet of mecha" in body? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Could we get some ALTtext? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- It's "fleet of mechas". I made a typo.
- Super Robot Wars GC (2004) - expand "released in 2004" for example. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done.
- pilot cut-in animations - probably "additional animations" would suffice. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done.
- "a different flavor" - if this is a quote, who said it. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Removed the quote and just said they wanted it to be different from the usual style of the series.
- "The Scrap Heap", any reason for title case? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Defined that it is the collective title she gave to the worst games.
- I feel this article needs a bit more notes on how it sold in comparrison to the original game. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Added that it sold significantly less than GC.
GA Review
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Review meta comments
[edit]- I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- Lee Vilenski: Adressed your comments. Namcokid47 23:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)