Talk:Super Punch-Out!!/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I can't see any major problem with the article. Perhaps some parts of it could be slighlty rewritten in order to avoid repetitions - in particular in "Reception" (repetition of "released") and "Gameplay" (repetition of "The player" / "The game", especially at the end). The gameplay section could also be shortened a bit, as the readers may not be interested in every single details of the gameplay. Other than that, I think it's a good article which fully covers the subject. Well done!
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- Too many repetitions in some sections, but overall it reads well.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Many different sources are used and they all seem reliable
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Broad in its coverage, but the gameplay section is actually a bit too detailed.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Both praises and criticisms are included in the Reception section
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
