Talk:Super Mario Strikers/GA1

GA Review

The article is neutral, broad, complies with the MoS, well-written and the images are correctly tagged. The sources are all fully detailed and reliable. I am passing Mario Strikers, it is a Good Article. There are a couple of extremely minor points which I'd like you to consider:

In the lead: "As in other Mario games such as Mario Power Tennis, the player can use Nintendo-based items such as bananas and red shells to hinder the opposition and gain the advantage.[2]" - a reader unfamiliar with Nintendo games could be forgiven for not understanding what is meant by "Nintendo-based items", please clarify this somehow.
- Is the new version better?
Development - great section but ideally could contain a few more details, like how many staff worked on the title, how long development took etc. That's assuming such sources even exist, but it's always worth asking.
- I'm afraid the sources I could find don't shed any light on this.
Reception - "Strikers' pick-up-and-play design will have you playing like a cartoon Pele in no time". Shouldn't Pele be wikilinked to the footballer?
- Yeah, I usually forget these things as I just copy-and-paste without thinking.
Reception is again a good solid section, but I was a little disappointed to see audio being relegated (pun intended) to a single sentence. Presumably the game contains the usual suspects in terms of FX and music, but are none of the sources offering anything more than what's here? Another sentence or two on the audio side would be good if you could find anything relevant for it.
- I've added a sentence; better? Thanks for the review. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 16:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's it, thanks for your time. Someone another 23:33, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've dealt with the suggestions too, excellent stuff. Someone another 09:06, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]