Talk:Super Mario Galaxy 2/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheLoverofLove (talk) 13:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

I've played quite some Mario games since i was 4-5, but i haven't played this game yet. Anyway this is my first time reviewing an article nominated as a good article. So lets get to it. Note: This is my first time reviewing an Article, so i may make a few mistakes.

I was impressed with the spelling and grammar. I didn't see any original research, and there were reliable sources. No swearing or any other weasel words. Everything looks well-done. But this is my first time reviewing, so i'll put it on Hold. I'd like someone with more experience to look over my review and see if I got everything. (TheLoverofLove (talk) 13:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC))

I"M BAACK! I did some research with the references, and they look reliable. Ref names have improved. No Link rots, looks fine to me. I think this meets a Good Article Criteria, so i'll Pass the article for now. But i'll still nes someone to see if i'm correct. Enjoy the pass, anyway. :) (TheLoverofLove (talk) 19:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC))

The above review, while enthusiastic, doesn't seem to be particularly comprehensive. I recommend getting a second reviewer, as suggested above. Christopher Connor (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. The above review only covered references and none of the content. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 02:55, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. I think someone should put this forth for a Good Article Reassessment. The reviewer should have put it on hold for a second opinion. If someone can do it that would be great, as I have no experience with doing such. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment

Mordecairule 14:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)