Jump to content

Talk:Super Bowl XXX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

I moved some of the trivia to the body; I'm not sure if it's enough to merit removal of the "too much trivia" thing, so I left it. What do people think?

Also, I put in a reference in footnote form, which doesn't seem to go with the references that are there. I'm not sure what to do about that, so I'm mentioning it here.

Brettalan 08:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ego's?

[edit]

Removed the comment about Jimmy Johnson and Jerry Jone's having big ego's. This isn't something that you can document as fact. It is only heresay and rumor. If you readd, please not a source for it.


neil blew it and mills getting injured did not help the steelers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.17.192 (talk) 22:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pittsburgh needed some defense

[edit]

Defense is ultimate when you want to win a Super Bowl. They really needed Joe Montana, but unfortunately couldn't get him.Tall short man woman (talk) 10:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum Leap

[edit]

In the second season of Quantum Leap in the episode "All Americans," Al notes that he is watching Super Bowl XXX and that the Steelers are three points behind. The game did in fact feature the Steelers, who trailed the Dallas Cowboys by three points—20-17—midway through the fourth quarter. This is notable because the episode was filmed over six years before the game actually took place.

I found this interesting enough to add to the talk page but it probably doesn't belong in the main article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.153.29.23 (talk) 22:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to be bold and put it in anyway. It's already been noted in the episode description (it was actually late in the fourth quarter, just over 4 minutes left before a turnover cost the Steelers an improbable comeback), and the worst that can happen is that it is reverted. If so, I'll accept that. — Glenn L (talk) 06:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]