Talk:Super Écran

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Super Écran article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Canada: Television Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Channel logos

I have removed the channel logos because they are unlicensed media and there is no real encyclopedic need to include them. Kelly Martin (talk) 21:11, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These logos are the official logos of the multiplex channels that Super Écran operates and therefor the logos should be included in the article to give it more detail and therefore make a better article overall. Other similar articles do the same so this one shall be no different then the rest.
- The fact that other articles violate our fair use policy is no excuse to do so here. Kelly Martin (talk) 01:43, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Fair use the use here is a decorative nature, and there is no discussion related to them. Wikipedia is not consistent yet, and violations in one place do not excuse them here. We expressly forbid using non free images for decorative purposes. --Gmaxwell 01:45, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, could you explain why exactly these logos have been removed and the main logo stays?

The main logo illustrates the subject. However, including all the logos is repetitive and redundant, especially since all of the logos are essentially identical. Kelly Martin (talk) 02:17, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I locate a copy of the old Premier Choix logo, from an early First Choice Program Guide, is this OK to post, as it is under Fair Use? --Jimj wpg 02:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If someone could find the description of each channel and what its content is, it would make good info to post in the article. For example creating a gallery with each of the channels logos and a description of each channel as to what each channel specializes in such as in The Movie Networks article where as MFun specializes in comedy and so on....