Talk:Sunshine (2007 film)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi - I made copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently changed the meaning) and jotted queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sunshine explores physics, science and religion - err, ok. sentence a bit short. Might flow better if fleshed out a little....
- Preceding its initial screening to the public, the film was generally met with positive critical reviews, but was not considered a box office success. - why is the "preceding" segment here? Surely both items are not dependent on that...?
- After completion of filming for Sunshine, Boyle said [that he would not revisit the science fiction genre, citing] production as a spiritually exhausting experience - can remove the bracketed bit as is stated again in next sentence. Or remove the latter instead.
- The director had also received advice that there would be advanced space programs with India and Brazil, but the advice was overlooked to avoid creating a cast that was too disparate - "overlooked" an odd choice, "ignored" or "not taken up" better
- Okay I wanna know...what is the alternative ending? Can slot in nicely after discussion of it....
- This was partly due to "disputes" between the lawyers of Underworld and Fox Searchlight. - why the quotes? choose another word (to distance from source) and dequote
- Did anyone talk about the sun-worship of two of the characters? Also the supernatural quality of the Icarus I captain?
Overall a good read. Not too much work required...
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality: - see above
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources: - some citations needed
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects: - see above
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: -
pending some issues to addressoutstanding issues listed above, which may be of help for future editors. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)