This article was nominated for deletion on 15 April 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.
Sunny Li received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
Hello reviewer, I, first of all, want to say that I'm a friend of Li and came here after a long discussion with her. Her page was tagged for various issues and I would like someone to review the page to fix the issue. My requests are below:
As per the history of her page in November 2017, someone tagged it with "This article needs additional citations for verification." At that time her biography paragraph wasn't having sources for verification, but on 14 January 2018, most of the information was deleted by a user named Bri so that tag is unwarranted because all the information is now sourced.
In October 2017, another tag UDP was added. The tag says "This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments." After the tag was placed a disclosure was also added on this talk page and the page was significantly edited and cleaned up as mentioned on the tag by the same user Bri so, this tag does not apply.
In February 2017, a tag COI was placed and a year after, the page was cleanup as mentioned in the tag by user Bri and a few more users so, this tag is also invalid.
Since these tags were first placed the page was significantly cleaned up, unsupported information was removed and does not read promotional so, I want to request the reviewer to remove these tags and add the picture. Thank you in advance.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.62.175 (talk) 17:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
N With regards to the maintenance templates, it is recommended that, as a courtesy, you first try asking the editor who assigned the template in order to find out from them if it can be removed. Since they placed the template, they are in the best position to know whether or not the issues which caused its placement have been corrected. You may contact them directly by placing a new message on their talk page. In the unlikely event that you do not hear back from them after a reasonable amount of time, please reopen this request by altering the {{request edit}} template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes to |ans=no.
Regards, Spintendo 13:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Spintendo. sir User:Bri can you review the page and comment which part of the page is still promotional and not sourced so the tags can be removed because they were added before you cleaned up this page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.62.175 (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Doc James: is there a good reason for replacing UDP tag? The tag itself reads: "It may require clean-up to comply with Wikipedia's content policies." I see the paid editing was disclosed at the top of this page and the article was significantly cleaned up by multiple users. WP:TMC state: " Their purposes are to foster improvement of the encyclopedia by alerting editors to changes that need to be made. Cleanup tags are meant to be temporary notices that lead to an effort to fix the problem, not a permanent badge of shame to show that you disagree with an article, or a method of warning readers about an article." so, what was the reason to re-tag? Best Murgh Krahi (talk) 04:04, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It contains promotional text like "In March 2017, it was announced that she would be going on a spring tour of the United Kingdom". I am not seeing how that announcement is notable? Instead it looks like an advert for her upcoming tour at the time.
And yes this article was originally created for payment. A bunch of the sources are not particularly good / are broken.
@Doc James: Thank you for sharing your thoughts, I have removed that line completely as un-verifiable and repaired those broken links. The article now looks natural as compared to this [1] when it was created for payment. Best Murgh Krahi (talk) 16:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And what is your relation to the topic in question User:Murgh Krahi? It is clear from above that this person is still trying to pay people to improve their page. So undisclosed paid editing is ongoing not just in the past. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have no relation with the topic in question @Doc James:. As per the history it looks all the paid edits were removed and the article now look natural. If you think the paid editing is ongoing the page can be protected from editing. Do you still believe it need cleanup? Best Murgh Krahi (talk) 18:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The most recent possible paid edit reverted by me was this in July 2019, it was poorly written and was completely unsourced, but the version as it stands now looks okay to me. GSS💬05:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Edit request partially implemented
I have placed the image in the article.
With regards to the maintenance templates, it is recommended that, as a courtesy, you first try asking the editor who assigned the template in order to find out from them if it can be removed. Since they placed the template, they are in the best position to know whether or not the issues which caused its placement have been corrected. You may contact them directly by placing a new message on their talk page. In the unlikely event that you do not hear back from them after a reasonable amount of time, please reopen this request by altering the 
