Talk:Sunken Village Archeological Site
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Photos
[edit]Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.
- HABS photos do not seem to be available.
- NRHP text and photos seem to be unavailable on-line, also.
- New photos are needed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Doncram (talk • contribs) 03:58, November 20, 2007
- I think it would be close to impossible to get any new images of an address-restricted archaeological site. Let's not encourage trespassing. Katr67 (talk) 06:03, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- 100% agreed. In the case of Sunken Village, however, there have been legitimate archaeological digs that have recovered artifacts. A photo of one or more those artifacts would be a fine illustration for this article. Ipoellet (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Excellent idea. Do you know where they are? Oregon Historical Society or ??? Katr67 (talk) 20:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- I don't. OHS would be a good place to start. I have also seen such photos published in a newsletter by the SHPO. Those specific images were non-free for Wikipedia purposes, but they might provide a lead on how to get acceptably licensed pics. Ipoellet (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Excellent idea. Do you know where they are? Oregon Historical Society or ??? Katr67 (talk) 20:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- 100% agreed. In the case of Sunken Village, however, there have been legitimate archaeological digs that have recovered artifacts. A photo of one or more those artifacts would be a fine illustration for this article. Ipoellet (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Refs for expansion
[edit]Katr67 (talk) 17:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Oops!
[edit]Sorry to have been so clumsy with what should have been a simple addition (I guess I got lost trying to understand the citation template! hope I did that right at least....) —Martha (talk) 02:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- i just added more to the reference. nice addition to the article, thanks. doncram (talk) 22:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- High-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- Stub-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of High-importance
- Stub-Class Oregon articles
- Mid-importance Oregon articles
- WikiProject Oregon pages
- Stub-Class Archaeology articles
- Unknown-importance Archaeology articles