Talk:Sun (supermarket tabloid)

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

How much history for this paper is appropriate for this article? I could easily discuss the corporate history of the tabloid world (in general terms, at least), but I'm not sure how appropriate any of that is for a general audience (or how interesting it'd be for anyone).

Actually, that would be very interesting. This article is lacking background. When was the sun founded? why? How many copies a year? Relevant scandals? Who owns the Sun? .etc .etc

Here's a Harper's Article on the 1992 defamation case over the "100-year-old mail carrier pregnant with love child!" headline. It's currently subscriber-only, but must exist on the web in a linkable-to format somewhere, mustn't it? Anyone know where?? --AMI

Why did it cease publication???

Why did the Sun cease publication? Low circulation/sales? If so, why did sales decline?

Are you looking for secondary sources on this? I doubt there are any. From the perspective of one in the newsroom during the final years, it was almost certainly a combination of lack of decent racking, a corporate aversion to risk in subject matter (so no experiments to try to appeal to new readership - recycled covers got stale), and, most of all, a weird inability to use the internet for promoting the publication. Sun never had a website, and until Bat Boy LLC bought the Weekly World News brand, the WWN only had a web presence in the scanned archives on Google Books. The bigger papers had websites - Enquirer and Globe. The irony there is that the stuff in Sun and WWN - the "wacky" tabs - was much more like the early internet: conspiracy theories, urban legends, and oddball stories about hard to believe (yet mmmmaybe true) events. Anyway, that's my recollection. The closest you'd find to a secondary source on this might be Jim Hogshire's books, but he was out of the tabloid game long before the wacky tabs tanked. - grant 21:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grantb (talk • contribs)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sunpict.jpg

Image:Sunpict.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sunpict.jpg

Image:Sunpict.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]