Talk:Sumner station/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 12:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Narrow and Traffic streets? So just clarifying, those are the names of the streets? That's weird but okeydokey. Out of curiosity is Narrow street particularly narrow? :)
- Yes, they are the real names and quite accurate.
- Why does the redlink 'Red Apple' pipe to ' Red Apple Markets'? Should you remove the piping if that's the actual name of the chain of stores?
- Removed the red link, but I plan to put the article at "Red Apple Markets" eventually. The company is commonly referred to as "Red Apple", but that title is taken by other articles.
- "two bicycle racks" - can you give any indication of how many spaces for bikes there are on the rack? I only ask as you're very specific with parking spaces, and this detail consequently highlights the lack of detail regarding the racks
- Added capacities for the bike racks and lockers.
- "awarded to Lumpkin General Contractor" - you previously mention a firm was based in Tacoma. Can you let us know where this contractor is based or something relevant about them?
- Couldn't find any information on the contractor.
- "were moved to a new facilities" - grammar
- Fixed.
- "on city-owned" - I'm a little confused by this. Is this the equivalent of saying "land owned by the city"
- Added missing word.
- "adjacent to the station in downtown" - should the word "in" be here? I'm honestly not sure.
- Removed "in downtown".
- Narrow and Traffic streets? So just clarifying, those are the names of the streets? That's weird but okeydokey. Out of curiosity is Narrow street particularly narrow? :)
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Looks really good. Placing on hold until minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 12:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Freikorp: I've addressed your points above. Thanks for the review. SounderBruce 20:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Passing. :) Freikorp (talk) 23:13, 13 May 2018 (UTC)