Talk:Summerteeth/GA1
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Commencing GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 23:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- "Wilco released Being There in 1996 to a considerably higher level of critical and commercial success than their debut album, A.M." - reference needed to substantiate claim that Being There had more critical/commercial success than AM.
- "The album received mostly positive reviews upon its release." This should be sourced or removed.
- Limited Edition Bonus Disc section has no reference and has been tagged since May 2009!!!
To uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of February 18, 2010, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR. This action has been taken immediately because the problems afflicting this article have been identified since as early as May 2009 with no remedies undertaken. There is no indication that problems identified in the reassessment will meet any different response. The article has failed GA criteria per the review set out below:
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- The article is generally well written.
- The article is generally well written.
- b (MoS):
- Conforms to manual of style. Problems with overlinking have been remedied.
- Conforms to manual of style. Problems with overlinking have been remedied.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
- The article lacks references for some material. More worrying, the section Limited Edition Bonus Disc contains no references and has been tagged as such since May 2009 - with no improvement undertaken in the interval.
- The article lacks references for some material. More worrying, the section Limited Edition Bonus Disc contains no references and has been tagged as such since May 2009 - with no improvement undertaken in the interval.
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- Citations are to third party publications.
- Citations are to third party publications.
- c (OR):
- No evidence of OR.
- No evidence of OR.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its scope.
- a (major aspects):
- Addresses major aspect of article subject matter.
- Addresses major aspect of article subject matter.
- b (focused):
- Remains focused. No digressions.
- Remains focused. No digressions.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
-
- No issues concerning POV evident.
- No issues concerning POV evident.
-
- It is stable:
- No edit wars etc.
- No edit wars etc.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Images are properly tagged and justified.
- Images are properly tagged and justified.
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images are accompanied by contextual captions.
- Images are accompanied by contextual captions.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Keep/Delist: DELIST ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 23:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep/Delist: DELIST
Given the issues identified in the review were addressed within 7 days, the outcome of the reassessment has been reversed to KEEP. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 02:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)