Talk:Summer Ranger

Summer Ranger has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 11, 2021. (Reviewed version).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Television: Hollyoaks Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hollyoaks task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Summer Ranger/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

Her first appearance on 23 November 2020 needs a source.

Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"who she later forms a romantic connection ~~with~~" → "with who she later forms a romantic connection"

Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "fun and sarcastic".

Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"on the series" → "in the series"

Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "Warren or Felix".

Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "for her character".

Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "work with Sienna".

Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "arrested for the drugging".

Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the comma after "admire Sienna".

Done – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
sources

References are archived.
Main issue here is WP:METRO.

I've not shied away from using Metro sources on soap articles before since the soap department of Metro is separate from the main tabloid site; it has an editorial team and gets all info from the soaps directly since they deal with spoilers and embargoes. Do you think it would be worth bringing this up in a discussion on the RSP? – DarkGlow • 19:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Probably. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:52, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·