With new data since February of 2009, the previous merger between the article "Sum" and the term "possibilianism" can be seen to be outdated. First, note that the term "possibilianism" is never once mentioned in the book Sum; there is no direct connection between the two except for an author in common. Second, as of June 2010, possibilianism is a term with over 10,000 google hits, is the subject of dozens of newspaper and magazine articles (New York Times, MSNBC, Huffington Post, etc -- see original ref list), and possibilianism was just the subject of a TED talk. The idea that it should be merged in with a book that never uses the term does not make sense any longer. For that reason, it is being unmerged back out into its own article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.90.60.88 (talk) 02:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
