Talk:Sukuk

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sukuk article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 60 days

Islam Start‑class

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Naveed.sukuk (talk · contribs) / Sukuk Sukuk This user has declared a connection. (COI declared through username)

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Advertising brochure

User:Continentaleurope why in the world do you want to use an advertising brochure as a source as you did here? And why would you edit war to keep it? Please bring this source to RSN if you feel so strongly; i very much doubt the community will endorse it but hey i could be wrong. Jytdog (talk) 01:19, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jytdog We agree the article is very bad and no source in it is good. If you study the source, I used, attentively it clearly outlines the meaning of the subject. The source I gave is not the perfect one but at the lack of any better it should be used. Also I have no idea of edit wars but you started by removing my improvement without providing a better source or trying to improve the article. I believe the way you engage with other users is scary. Try to be nice with everyone and do not scare contributors. I will avoid articles which you seem to be very protective about them in order not to be involved in an "edit war with you". I do not understand necessarily all the reasons you mentioned for the removal such as some wiki policies but seriously your attack or threats will not lead to any better. You can also see my edit history and see that I do not promote any adverts and contribute to a variety of subjects. You made it clear that the community will not endorse me as you have a sort of people who will use similar arguments, yet I never meant to make "your" article worst than it is. You could have easily messaged me without any abusive powers and introduce me to better editing.

Do not take this as an offence but there are better ways to approach editors and please consider me as doing things in good faith. Also if you need any help in improving an article please tag me. I can be of help to you instead of a "threat". Some articles really need improvement and I am sure you meant no harm and have made several good contributions.Continentaleurope (talk) 01:38, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it is not reliable. Given it's promotional nature, removal looks like the correct response. --Ronz (talk) 16:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links moved from article

There might be something in here that we can use as a source or to find better sources. --Ronz (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing Financial Risks of Sukuk Structures
~~Sukuk Islamic Financial Instruments~~ ^{[dead link]}
Risks of Sukuk structures: Implications for resource mobilization (pay wall)
Euromoney Encyclopedia Islamic Finance Khorshid (advertisement)
~~Al-Sukuk.com - Sukuks explained~~^{[dead link]}
Global Sukuk and Islamic Securitization Market: Financial Engineering and Product Innovation
Understanding Islamic Finance (brief and elementary)

Some of these links are dead. --BoogaLouie (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]