Talk:Sufyani

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 May 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hgz34.11?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=%22Sufyani%22&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3Fwc%3Don%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3BQuery%3D%2522Sufyani%2522&refreqid=search%3A91dba44d301a198c33c6f34a54d7db3f&seq=16#page_scan_tab_contents

Dubious article

In addition to not particularly resembling an actual Wikipedia article, a great deal of this article is dubious, and also incorrectly refers to Shia beliefs as uniform Muslim beliefs.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.120.69.176 (talk) 21:32, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POV Issues and varify issues

Okay, I am not sure how to start this however I will try and explain the problems with this article without going into an essay which by all means will be difficult. (i) This article should not be written by making extraordinary claims without various non WP:BIAS sources (see WP:REDFLAG.) (ii) The article is often written like a story and requires a re-write to be in accordance with WP:POV. Olowe2011 ^Talk 06:30, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore - With regard to This edit it makes an extraordinary claim that something will happen. Says who? And other than a clearly WP:BIAS source what other sources can be used to validate this claim having being made. In addition to this, this is Wikipedia and not a religious script. I hope someone will take the time to rewrite this article so it meets Wikipedia's standards. Olowe2011 ^Talk 06:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did it. Moses Alkadhem (talk) 21:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decent article

This article pertains to Shia beliefs only. Taking this into consideration, it may not be sourced and cited correctly, and the structure of the writing may not be in the style wikipedia desires, but the content is good, and matches most of the common shia beliefs. THis is a good article, and could be fixed up without removing valuable content. I vote to keep and that it's "neutrality" is fine. However I advocate "cleaning up" 27.33.119.145 (talk) 14:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]