Talk:Sufficiency of disclosure in Canadian patent law
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sufficiency of disclosure in Canadian patent law article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment
[edit]The article currently appears to be well-referenced, but its title is awful and it's not integrated into related articles in Wikipedia, most notably Patent law in Canada. A better title might be to simply flip it around to "Patent law in Canada - Sufficiency of specification." PKT(alk) 16:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Why not Sufficiency of disclosure in Canadian patent law or Sufficiency of disclosure under Canadian patent law? See also Sufficiency of disclosure... --Edcolins (talk) 18:18, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
[edit]This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of Toronto supported by WikiProject Wikipedia and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/25 November 2011
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2011 Q3