Talk:Sue Ellen Ewing

Sue Ellen Ewing has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 11, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Infobox Image

Musicfreack7676, I really feel strongly that the other image I uploaded is a better picture of Gray herself and is used more widely than the one that you uploaded. Is there anyway I can find a better quality image of the one I uploaded and replace it? Would you be objective of that? Either way, we're still using a promotional image, so WP:FAIRUSE would be an argument even if we kept the picture that is there now. The image from here [1], in my opinion, is much more flattering than the one in the infobox right now. HorrorFan121 (talk) 14:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree about the flattery of the image. The one I uploaded flatters the actress much better HorrorFan. In the one you want, she's not smiling and looks pissed off. In my image, she is smiling and looks healthy and just glowing more. In that image, she looks beyond fake. It's not about what's widely used either, so that argument is invalid. And if you want to address me directly, next time, come to me. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 21:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's really no need to get grouchy. If you really feel strongly about it, I'll drop the whole thing. It's merely a matter of preference. HorrorFan121 (talk) 23:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. I wasn't getting grouchy at all. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 23:42, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How broad is the coverage in this article?

As this character is a well-known soap opera character - why is the coverage limited to sixteen sources? The rest are episode citations. The sections look as though they contain much information - but upon reading the article, I was offered a large collection of quotes taken from each of the sixteen sources. There are hundreds of sources out there for her. Just wondering if any intends to add more information?Rain the 1 21:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely intend to, hopefully once the first season concludes as that's when users will likely calm down on the editing front. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 22:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear MF. I'm surprised it wasn't brought up sooner. I just had a quick look around and found book sources, newspaper sources, generic search results offering reception and analysis. I think that Highbeam etc will turn up more too. Then like you say, the new info on the new series. There is great potential here.Rain the 1 22:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is fantastic potential but I definitely want to wait until the ten episodes of the revival air, etc. Because editors will be continually coming in and adding things and making fancraft edits. _{MusicFreak7676} ^TALK! 22:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that's my doing. When I first crafted the article, there were far less sources to be used (in terms of original casting, characterization, etc.) as they had yet to start promoting the new show as heavily as they did a few months back. The reception section would be the most to benefit from the new information concerning the revival, as there were very few I could remember finding when I searched for citations. I've never used Highbeam before either...though it does look beneficial to finding sources, particularly for older character references. HorrorFan121 (talk) 21:38, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you look in Google's archives, there are old news articles on the character. Searching the other archives would be useful too. The free library, fairfax - some of the other pay ones if accessible. Do you want me to find some sources and list them here?Rain the 1 21:49, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That would be great. Unfortunately, I've never been good at tracking down good references. Haha. If more information can be found relating primarily to those sections, some of the longer quotes could be trimmed down that are being used to sum up the information. I still think it's good to include them though in some form. A lot of character articles have direct quotes from the actor/actress, producer, etc. HorrorFan121 (talk) 22:17, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know they do - I'm always editing soap opera articles and the interviews prove to be really useful. Just have to paraphrase them. I have posted some sources below - I'll keep adding to the list as I go along.Rain the 1 23:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That could actually lead to a MAJOR expansion. As Musicfreak7676 said though, it's probably best to wait until the revival has concluded before making any major changes. HorrorFan121 (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully this will be sorted now. Months have passed now - and like I said, below is just the beggining for this famous fictional character.Rain the 1 09:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[2] - The Age - Reception - Lists her as one of their "Top 20 TV Vixens"
[3] - The Sun-Herald - Original departure and reception
[4] - The Sydney Morning Herald - Source for return during the original series finale
[5] - The Age - Gray admits that Sue Ellen was a hard role to "shake off".
[6] - The Newcastle Herald - Reception
[7] - The Sydney Morning Herald - States that Gray is best known as "J.R.'s boozing wife"
[8] - Virgin Media - Reception/characterisation
[9] - Virgin Media - More reception
[10] - Yahoo! - Reception on Gray's portrayal
[11] - TMZ.com - Name her "everyone's favorite alcoholic wife Sue Ellen Ewing"
[12] - Gray explains how she rejoined the show for the reboot
[13] - The Independent - Reception and Gray names her character "the original deperate housewife"
[14] - The Daily Telegraph - 2006 Gray interview about Sue Ellen
[15] - The Guardian - Gray discusses the problems she had with producers etc, some other useful bits too
[16] - Sunday Mercury - Reception and Who Shot JR storyline
[17] - What's on TV - Gray discusses the creation and early development of Sue Ellen
[18] - Daily Record (Scotland) - Sue Ellen: "the world's most celebrated female drunk"Rain the 1 23:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Date of marriage (Sue Ellen & J.R.)

I still think, that they married in 1970. I remember this one episode "Anniversary" (season 5 episode 18): J.R. and Sue Ellen celebrate the anniversary of their meeting at the Miss Texas beauty pageant. It's 1967 (and here is another mistake by the way the episode aired in February 1982 but J.R. says its her 14th anniversary) and I'm sure they said that they married three years later several times. (Unfortunately I can't come up with episodes for this, because I would have to watch every single episode...) And the marriage was in December 1982, not December 1981 (season 6 episode 10/11). --Jany90 (talk) 13:50, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sue Ellen Ewing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Linda Gray.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]