Talk:Sucker Punch (soundtrack)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs) 10:14, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review
- No dead links found.
- found no edit wars.
- Will be referring to other soundtrack articles to see if this article need any improvement or not. ASHU^IND 14:40, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I feel the composition section can be expanded. Please work on it since it's only mentioning where the song is taken from and reception about that particular song is quoted. ASHU^IND 15:01, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Added more content to it. igordebraga ≠ 01:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Are there no certificates for this album? like platinum or gold? ASHU^IND 09:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - No (chart runs are modest). igordebraga ≠ 15:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Not much concerns here. ASHU^IND 18:01, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
No such concerns here. Article has been searched thoroughly for such references. ASHU^IND 18:01, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
All such aspects have been covered. Some issues were there but were resolved. ASHU^IND 18:01, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Fine here.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. ASHU^IND 18:01, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Keep up the good quality of Article. Don't let it delisted.
Regards.
ASHU^IND 18:01, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]