Jump to content

Talk:Sturgeon Point Light

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Authority re Coast Guard attempt to close Sturgeon Point lighthouse and remove the Fresnel lens

[edit]

Google the following: Coast Guard Sturgeon Point decommissioning If one looks at the Alcona County Historical Society, which was on point in collecting the 5000 plus signatures (in a town that has 600 people), you might find more. Additionally, there was (at one time) a public comment section with the Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, where comments were posted protesting the move.

http://www.doi.gov/news/07_News_Releases/070208.html regarding the transfer of the lighthouse to the Society.

Since I've given up editing or contributing to articles, that's the most I'll do. Good luck 7&6=thirteen (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

I would also note that Sturgeon Point light station was the preferred southern boundary of the National Marine Sanctuary. [ref>National Marine Sanctuary.</ref>http://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/list/epa-impact/msg02891.htmlhttp://legalminds.lp.findlaw.com/list/epa-impact/msg02891.html 7&6=thirteen (talk) 18:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

The point regarding the southern boundary of the NMS is already in there. First sentence under "contemporary status". Ipoellet (talk) 20:56, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
At least some references on the point have been put in. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 03:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

John A. McGean

[edit]

This wreck is listed in Shipwrecks of the 1913 Great Lakes storm as being proximate to Sturgeon Point Light. However, I found this on line, which indicates that it sank near Harbor Beach, Michigan.[1] 7&6=thirteen (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

The following was posted elsewhere. This would seem to make it clear enough that the McGean isn't anywhere near Sturgeon Point Light. I am pulling that section.
Captain Ron Burkhard gives instructions in the Lakeshore Guardian where to dive the wreck of the McGean. It's about 9.5 statute miles off of Harbor Beach. [2] --HB Edit (talk) 23:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
7&6=thirteen (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Isaac M. Scott

[edit]

Isaac M. Scott wreck is listed in Shipwrecks of the 1913 Great Lakes storm as being proximate to Sturgeon Point Light. However, the location of the wreck as described in the following article seems to contradict that.[3] It states that mariners made certain assumptions about the likely direction of the vessel, and had wrongly guessed where it went down. It states: "In 1976, the wreck of the Scott was discovered at 175 feet about six to seven miles northeast of Thunder Bay Island. The vessel is upside down and half buried in the mud." 7&6=thirteen (talk) 19:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Stan[reply]

Height of the tower and focal plane

[edit]

Looking at the National Park Service and the Alcona County Historical Society website, it is clear that the tower is 70' 9" tall. However, Terry Pepper (surprisingly) erroneously reports (in my opinion) that it is 98 feet tall (in his table of heights of lighthouses). David Wobser reports that it is 79 feet to the top of the ventilator ball.[4] I don't have a precise measurement (other than rough eyeballing) of the difference between the base of the light and the historic lake level, but I am guesstimating at more than 5 to 10 feet. Hey, you've got an uphill walk. I know that this is a 3.5 Order Fresnel, and do not think that it has a "bullseye" like the Point Betsie Light did that gave it a more effective range. In passing, I note that looking at the pictures, the 2 1/2 story building seems more consistent with the lower height on the tower to me. Anyway, that's my report. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 01:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]

Because of the questions I raised, I wrote to Terry Pepper, who is now the executive direct of the Great Lakes Light Keepers Association. Of course, he is the author of Terry Pepper, Seeing the Light, Lighthouses of the western Great Lakes. He was kind enough to write back with a detailed response, and he has given me permission to post this here:
Good call - that number is clearly incorrect.
As you are no doubt aware, height from water level to the focal plane was the metric of critical importance to mariners, since through triangulation the mariner could determine his distance from the light. To this end, focal height has been reported in US Light Lists since the earliest days. The physical height of the structure was of far lesser importance to mariners, and was only rarely included. For reasons I have yet been unable to determine, the 1914 issue of the Great Lakes Light List broke the mold, and included both metrics in its description of the lights. As such, I would consider that volume to be the definitive reference on the height of Great Lakes lighthouses.

According to the 1914 Great Lakes Light List, Sturgeon Point lighthouse stood 71 feet from base to top of lantern, and 69 feet from mean high water to focal plane.
Interestingly, the metric specifics used in calculating focal height changed frequently over the years, varying between low water, mean water, and high water. (The Coast Guard currently reports distance from mean high water.

I hope this helps.
This should settle this issue, and provide some guidance in the future for editors. Best to you all. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 15:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC) Stan[reply]


FYI on U.S. Coast Guard list of Michigan lights

[edit]

The Coast Guard has changed the URL on its list of Michigan lights. The URL must now end with ".asp" not "html." This is going to need to be changed on all those other articles. Hope this helps.

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Point aux Barques Lighthouse Society on John V. McGean.
  2. ^ http://www.lakeshoreguardian.com/_2003/122003/sunkenhistory.php
  3. ^ Northeast dive news, Isaac M. Scott.
  4. ^ [1]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sturgeon Point Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:52, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Sturgeon Point Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Sturgeon Point Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sturgeon Point Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sturgeon Point Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
There were ten entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.
  • WP:ELCITE: access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.
  • WP:ELBURDEN: Disputed links should be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them. -- Otr500 (talk) 18:12, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sturgeon_Point_Light&oldid=1208376061"