Talk:Studies in the Psychology of Sex Vol. 7

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Original Research

How are we supposed to know what is or isn't original research? Anyone who writes an article is doing original research, even if you compile it from existing sources it has to be original to some extent. Maybe they should knock this silly category on the head. Just my thoughts. Probably not original, so that's OK then. As for the article I find it well written and well sourced, much better than some articles which are not flagged. It contains a lot of interesting historical information about sex too, which I didn't know.--Max Loungeroom (talk) 06:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]