Talk:Struma (river)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bulgaria Mid‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece: Byzantine Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Untitled

Is it really proper to move this to Struma? Is there a regular English term for it? In my experience it is always Strymon, but that's mostly from reading references to it in the context of ancient Greece. (Google gets 594 results for "Strymon River" and 641 for "Struma River", by the way.) Adam Bishop 13:37, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I see 2,410 English pages for Strymon river and 2,480 English pages for Struma river on Google. I don't know offhand whether most of the river flows through Bulgaria, but it probably does and it seems that the native term is taking over the ancient one. (I dislike the practice of using " River" in article titles, but that's different.) --Joy [shallot] 03:18, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Actually there're 218 results for Strymon river and 352 for Struma river. There're also 74 results for Strouma river. I think that if English hasn't got its own word for the river, the article should take the native name. Struma rises in Bulgaria, and the article should be Struma River. --webkid 08:21, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

How can it go 400 km south if it's only 290 km long? The other way around would make sense. However, another possibility is that one or both numbers are incorrect. Jeroen 13:37:20, 2005-08-09 (UTC)

Naming

See Talk:Struma#Naming.

You are missing a very important point here. Regardless if it is Struma or Strymon, the discharge of this river is way beyond 76 thousand cubic meters per second. For your information the discharge of Mississippi is a meager 13 thousand cubic meters per second. Please fix your numbers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.126.228.33 (talk) 16:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Better map?

I just wanted to ask if anyone can find a better map. I clicked on the map, but I still could make no sense of it. Maybe my eyes are getting old, but even with my glasses on this map was not helpful to me. Sorry if I have put this comment in the wrong place. Wikipedia has changed itself a bit, so I can no longer comment directly on the talk page. Please! Better map? I speak not as an editor but as a user. 46.12.92.230 (talk) 21:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The river is highlighted (unusually) in red - at least this article has a map, unlike a lot of others--Jokulhlaup (talk) 16:32, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]