Talk:Stromatoveris

Animals Low‑importance

Stromatoveris is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Previously A Plant"?

I thought the original paper described Stromatoveris as a possible link between Charnia-like frond vendobiots and combjellies, not as "plants". Am I mistaken?--Mr Fink (talk) 16:42, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The editor who added the information completely misread the article, which likens Stromatoveris to plants but does not identify it as one. 2001:569:782B:7A00:3523:4B67:24F6:F5A1 (talk) 05:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments - and corrections to my original edit - Yes - *entirely* agree with the updated edit after a closer look at the articles^[1]^[2] - Thanks again - and - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 12:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Barras, Colin (8 August 2018). "These half-billion-year-old creatures were animals—but unlike any known today". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aav0347. Retrieved 8 August 2018.
^ Hoyal Cuthill, Jennifer H.; Han, Jian (2018). "Cambrian petalonamid Stromatoveris phylogenetically links Ediacaran biota to later animals". Paleontology. doi:10.1111/pala.12393.

[SCI-20180808a-1] Barras, Colin (8 August 2018). "These half-billion-year-old creatures were animals—but unlike any known today". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aav0347. Retrieved 8 August 2018.

[SCI-20180808-2] Hoyal Cuthill, Jennifer H.; Han, Jian (2018). "Cambrian petalonamid Stromatoveris phylogenetically links Ediacaran biota to later animals". Paleontology. doi:10.1111/pala.12393.

[1]

[2]