Talk:Strictly Come Dancing series 16

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Dance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles

WikiProject Dance To-do list:

To nominate at WP:FAC:
To improve to Featured standard:
To nominate as a Good article:
To expand: 18th century dance - 20th century ballet - Bolero - Choreography on Broadway - Dance education - English ballet - Indian classical dance - Italian ballet - List of dance companies - Meg Stuart - Opera ballet - Sasha Waltz - Scotch reel - Set dance - Physically integrated dance
To cleanup: Contra dance - Salsa (dance) - Dandiya - Lead and follow
To unbias:
To check for copyvios:
To merge: List of dancers and List of dance personalities‎ as per AfD discussion
Substubs needing expansion: see /substubs
To destub: Amir Hossain Babu - Canada Dance Festival - Dance etiquette - Flash dance - more
Needing references: Chorus line - specifically verifying that each girl actually started out as a chorine
To create: Broadway dance - Country Western Dance International - Dance and cinema - Dance and society - German folk dancing - Latin swing - Post-structuralist ballet - Push (dance) - Salon dance - Shuffle dance - Swing boogie - World Dance Alliance - Xavier Le Roy - more
Wanted Pics/Graphics: Category:Dance articles needing images

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Headers

Just been looking back at previous series, and the header says 'Couples' not 'Celebrities' should this be changed, also on the main page 'Participating' has a blue background @Yoshi876: as you're a recent editor do you agree?

The pairings won't be revealed until the launch show so it can be kept as 'Celebrities' until then, and I have fixed the light blue background MSalmon (talk) 21:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shirley's vote in Week 3

Although she didn't get to vote to SAVE she stated that she would have voted for Lee & Nadiya not Charles & Karen so can we please stop changing it MSalmon (talk) 20:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a source to this sentence, hopefully that will stop any future edit warring over this. Iffy★Chat -- 12:33, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Strictly2018: I was adding a source that confirms the statement about Shirley's vote to prevent edit warring, there's no reason to remove the source as you're agreeing with me and the source. Also, I'd like to see a more reliable source than Instagram for which dance someone is doing next week. Iffy★Chat -- 19:14, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Iffy: The source is unnecessary. Strictly2018 (talk) 08:58, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think the explicit source citation was more useful than the hidden note in helping to prevent erroneous reversion. But yes, it is a simple content fact that can be easily verified by watching that episode. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:53, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Even with IPs temporarily blocked from editing the page, the explicit source citation is useful because the situation is unusual and having it certainly isn't harming anything. So I've reverted Strictly2018's latest attempt to remove it. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly2018, you are coming perilously close to edit warring over this, and there is not a consensus in this discussion for removing the reference. I strongly recommend that you refrain from removing it again while the matter is being discussed here. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings Graph

Something needs to be done about the ratings. Notes have to be put in place. I've noticed that the ratings for some episodes are either the weekly top 30, or the new 4 screen dashboard figures provided by BARB. A decision needs to be made about which one to use. TheMysteriousEditor (talk) 19:44, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]