Jump to content

Talk:Strict Machine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re-Release

[edit]

Was the '04 re-release the same track? Was it remixed in any way? There's no mention of it - oh, and where did it chart on the initial release?

The '04 release was the same track, but with different remixes and artwork. The original chart position was #25 (see the charts section). -- Underneath-it-All 19:09, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As per Goldfrapp's official website, even though it was the same song it was treated as an additional single. I recommend Strict Machine 2004 getting its on wiki after the release of Black Cherry single and before Ooh La La.Justaduckyguy 09:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bias

[edit]

"While receiving some well placed publicity in the Verizon Wireless commercial for the new LG Electronics Mobile Communications' "Chocolate" wireless phone, the song is clearly derivative of Donna Summer's disco-era hit I Feel Love. Strict Machine sounds like a stripped down version of the 1970's dance classic with slower tempo, and elevated bass and distortion levels."

I didn't quite know how to rephrase this so it does not sound bias, but it clearly is. TrevorLSciAct 23:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If Strict Machine is clearly a derivative of I Feel Love, then so is about 80% of the pop-dance music of the last about 5-7 years. That's what I think. Also, I've read quite a few reviews of this track and somehow none of the reviewers seemed to be struck by this clear familiarity - no offence, but maybe you should back yourself up with something a bit more convincing than writing clearly in italics.

Basically that sentence above suggests that Strict Machine only got a little attention for Goldfrapp because it ripped off a hugely popular song and later it was used for an advert. That's grossly unfair.

I think it is unfair--and I did not write it (by clearly I meant that it was clearly bias. I happen to love the songTrevorLSciAct 21:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it is clearly derivative of I Feel Love, so there was no point in anybody taking that personally. However, a better way to phrase that might be to say that it bears a strong resemblance to the Donna Summer song in question? Just putting in my $0.02. Justaduckyguy 09:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What people fail to mention is the striking resemblance to the group's lead single off the next album (Ooh La La). There is no denying that the song uses the I Feel Love base, many many songs are doing it, more lately than ever, it still does not make it untrue. Dollvalley (talk) 12:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but ...

[edit]

What the hell is the song about? Fergananim 17:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's about a rat.

Fair use rationale for Image:Smachinedvd.jpg

[edit]

Image:Smachinedvd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sm04cover.jpg

[edit]

Image:Sm04cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Strict Machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Strict Machine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Strict Machine

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Strict Machine's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "allmusic":

  • From Seventh Tree: Phares, Heather. "Seventh Tree – Goldfrapp". AllMusic. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
  • From Disco: "House : Significant Albums, Artists and Songs, Most Viewed". AllMusic. Archived from the original on October 6, 2012. Retrieved October 12, 2012.
  • From Black Cherry (Goldfrapp album): Phares, Heather. "Black Cherry – Goldfrapp". AllMusic. Retrieved 18 December 2016.
  • From Some Girls (Rachel Stevens song): Hoffman, K. Ross. "Come and Get It – Rachel Stevens". AllMusic. Retrieved 10 January 2017.
  • From Head First (Goldfrapp album): Phares, Heather. "Head First – Goldfrapp". AllMusic. Retrieved 29 June 2015.
  • From The Singles (Goldfrapp album): Phares, Heather. "The Singles – Goldfrapp". AllMusic. Archived from the original on 29 November 2016. Retrieved 13 February 2012.
  • From Supernature (Goldfrapp album): Phares, Heather. "Supernature – Goldfrapp". AllMusic. Retrieved 21 July 2015.
  • From What You Waiting For?: "Love.Angel.Music.Baby. – Gwen Stefani | Awards". AllMusic. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved November 14, 2015.
  • From Felt Mountain: Phares, Heather. "Felt Mountain – Goldfrapp". AllMusic. Retrieved 21 July 2016.
  • From Tales of Us: Phares, Heather. "Tales of Us – Goldfrapp". AllMusic. Retrieved 8 September 2013.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Strict_Machine&oldid=1205480935"