Talk:Street press

Edits by User:Iandg@iandg.com.au

I have reverted some of this individual's edits for the following reasons:

The user on his user page, as well as on his website (iandg.com.au), indicates that he is in charge of I&G Media, a company which specialises in the promotion of such things as, well, street press. The user is providing links on things such as "How to Advertise", which seem to link to his own company. I think there is quite an obvious conflict of interest there.
While the user has done a little bit of cleanup to the "Examples" section, some links have been duplicated unnecessarily.
The user has also broken existing Wikiformatting, such as by changing all the headings to all caps.

If anyone is of the opinion that I've been a bit too harsh, feel free to kick me up the backside ;-). Lankiveil 07:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC).\[reply]

Plurality?

Should it be 'the street press' or 'street presses?' I'd edit the article but I am not sure what would be gramatically correct. Mfgreen 06:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Street newspapers

Would street newspapers fall within the category of street press? rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 03:47, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete reference

I have deleted a reference styled "The Street Press Australia story" as the link was dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.225.26.170 (talk) 04:21, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]