Talk:Strawberry Schoolhouse

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arizona Low‑importance

	Arizona portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arizona, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Arizona on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArizonaWikipedia:WikiProject ArizonaTemplate:WikiProject ArizonaArizona articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bot

The bot is in error. Removing the notice now.--The Old Pueblo (talk) 00:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain in what sense the bot is wrong, The Old Pueblo? Just looking at this, it appears to be copied from somewhere; if I had to guess, I'd say http://www.pinestrawhs.org/schoolhouse.html. As this tool shows, there is very substantial word-for-word similarity between your initial version and that page. Unless, of course, I am missing something? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:40, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The bot said I copied the info from some webpage I had never even seen before. Thats why it is wrong.--The Old Pueblo (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was afraid you might say that. The bot correctly tagged the article for having content copied from the internet, which as you must know is against our copyright policy. That it noted the wrong one of several sites carrying the same content does not change that. What matters here is whether you copied or not, not which particular site you copied from. I've now blanked the article and listed it at WP:Copyright problems for review; it will probably be looked at within a week or two. Please do not edit it in the meantime; you can work on a rewrite if you wish (instructions on the template). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:06, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]