Talk:Strasburg Rail Road

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	May 12, 2009

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks references.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Strasburg Rail Road.

Comments

Why is there an advertisement for the book in the article?75.139.245.218 17:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have written to the Strasburg RR for non-copyrighted information. 216.164.138.57 13:43, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have visited the RR and recommend it to anyone looking for a good family day-trip.09:58, 14 February 2006 (UTC)BlueTemplar13

I changed the importance from low to mid. I use the general rule that if a railroad or museum is operating or open to the public it should be mid. I use low on non-operating or defunct outfits. n2xjk 05:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, changing the importance to mid is a good idea. SRR is one of two places in North America that has the facilities to restore and repair steam locomotives. Grango242 03:24, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Strasburg Rail Road logo.jpg

Image:Strasburg Rail Road logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Locomotive status

(Personal attack removed) You keep on deleting the fact that Strasburg #4 is going under restoration, even though there's proof!!! See this: http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/locoPicture.aspx?id=100329

See the proof? 98.177.248.237 (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While it is certainly true that 4/1187 returned to the SRC from the museum in 2003, in recent years the engine has been sitting outside while shop work has been focused on contract work and on Strasburg's operable engines. The photos you've provided show that the engine has been outside in storage, rather than under active repair. I and several other editors feel it is misleading to imply that the engine is under active restoration.

Also, I encourage you to choose alternative wordings when communicating to other Wikipedia editors, because you may scare some people off who may be able to help you.

Since we've started a thread, does anyone have thoughts on what makes a locomotive sufficiently relevant to be on this page? In particular I'm wondering if it is necessary to mention 98 in the former locomotives section. Thanks! Braytoncycle (talk) 03:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Style Inconsistent

Stopped in to fix a dead link in the references/citations - and found another mess - the second reference appears at the end of the page as OPEN-SQUARE-BRAKET 1 CLOSE-SQUARE-BRACKET. Not sure if the second references is really a reference at all, as it is just a link to the website of the "Lancaster Farmland Trust". These two links: http://www.strasburgrailroad.com/farmland-preservation/ and http://www.lancasterfarmlandtrust.org/partnerships/strasburg_rr.html substantiate the claim that there is a connection, but I am not sure what the correct citation or citation style should be - it just looks wrong now. Please Help BrianFennell (talk) 02:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lots about steam engines - but nothing about new yard??

Would be interested to see information about this, and more on freight traffic. User:Haraldmmueller 19:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Funny you mention this, I have the October 2023 issue of Trains magazine which ran a story on the freight operations. I'm planning some additions soon. Unfortunately most railfans are too busy obsessing over the steam engines to care about anything else... this article is also in serious need of cleanup to remove railfan trivia and improper sourcing. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 June 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Is there any chance if this edit can be reverted back please here:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Strasburg_Rail_Road&diff=prev&oldid=1229367113, this user completed deleted info on Strasburg 90’s off the lists of locomotives that is mentioned above the second section of the article tgst talks about the engines they have, plus, the info that user also deleted mentions 90’s FRA and overhaul. If someone can revert that info back the way it was, that would be great! 24.34.98.200 (talk) 20:10, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done No explanation was given but my guess is they removed it because the citation (from 2022) doesn't confirm it is currently being restored. I added this text back and copied a citation from Great Western 90 for this claim. Jamedeus (talk) 21:41, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change "unit" to "motive power" on page referring to locomotives. 71.121.171.92 (talk) 23:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: no reason or sources given for the proposed change. M.Bitton (talk) 23:59, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]