Talk:Strange Days (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Strange Days (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 18, 2016	Good article nominee	Listed

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Clarke, Julie (2009). The Paradox of the Posthuman: Science Fiction/Techno-Horror Films and Visual Media. VDM Verlag. ISBN 3639143795. ("In particular it provides close readings of the films Alien Resurrection, GATTACA, Crash and Strange Days")
Kaveney, Roz (2005). "The Mirrored Gaze: James Cameron's and Kathryn Bigelow's Strange Days". From Alien to The Matrix: Reading Science Fiction Film. I.B. Tauris. ISBN 1850438056.
Rascaroli, Laura (2004). "Time Travel and Spectatorship in 12 Monkeys and Strange Days". In Rickman, Gregg (ed.). The Science Fiction Film Reader. Limelight Editions. pp. 355–368. ISBN 0879109947.

Archives

Archive 1

is it an action film

it has gun fights fist fights and car chases but it also has sci fi and crime mix in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomwikiman (talk • contribs) 20:59, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fiennes and Bassett

The article mentions that this was the first pairing of Fiennes and Bassett - is there a subsequent pairing that is better known ? -- Beardo (talk) 20:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to IMDB Common Cast Search, only awards shows. --Fracai (talk) 20:24, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Strange Days (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adamstom.97 (talk · contribs) 11:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing this for review, soon. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article is pretty good, just a couple of things:

Based on its content, I think the Conception section should be renamed Development.
The plot summary is too long. It should be 700 words at the most.

Just sort those out and we'll be good to go. - adamstom97 (talk) 23:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I renamed the Conception section to Development. As for the plot section, I will try to reduce it further tonight but it's going to be quite a challenge because the film is quite long and has many details that are relevant to understand the plot. Regards. --Niwi3 (talk) 12:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do your best. I can help out if needs be, but I haven't seen the film so it will be better if you do it. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:41, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to remove a whole paragraph and I'm happy with the result. What do you think? Thanks --Niwi3 (talk) 20:51, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good job. We still need to get a bit more out, which I can help with later on, or you can keep trying. Just little bits here and there should do it. I'll get back to you when I can. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:04, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've cut a bit more out for you and by my count the summary is now under the 700 words, so I'm going to promote the article. Of course, feel free to adjust the wording if you wish, but you should definitely try and keep the word count down under 700. Passed

- adamstom97 (talk) 11:16, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]