Talk:Storm Financial
Appearance
A fact from Storm Financial appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Disputed: factual accuracy of sources
[edit]From what I understand, this wiki appears to contain a number of factual inaccuracies in referencing a website 'The Plain Truth'. This source appears to hold a biased presentation directly relating to the matters that are currently the subject of current court proceedings in Australia.
I suggest the sources of the article be reviewed to sources of a more neutral manner which can be verified without bias. In the interim, I suggest the addition of an Accuracy Dispute at the top of the wiki. CommunityAdam (talk) 23:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- From a quick browse of the edit history, it would appear most of the dubious content sourced from the aforementioned site was added by what I can only assume is a WP:SPA account (User:56edmonddantes; maybe a reference to Edmond Dantes?). I'm not well versed in Wiki etiquette; would it be appropriate to comb the diffs, cherry-pick the better cited statements and update the page accordingly? Bawb131 (talk) 16:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)