Talk:StorPool Storage

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Untitled

Article nominated for speedy deletion because it's definitely about software company with no credibility. Google is silent and most of the links are to self-publtished materials, PRs and sponsored reviews. No way to fix... WP:NOT marketing vehicle for anybody! APS (Full Auto) (talk) 13:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see in the history that after that statement you are trying to improve the article. I believe that most of the the confusion is because we are dealing with both company and software product with same name so the SEO is (sort of) messed up. As more experienced wikipedian what is your opinion? Is it possible the same article to be used for both entities and reworked on that direction (if we are on same page about the source of the confusion) or to split the article on two full pages - one for StorPool_(company) which develop and support (as separate article related to the technology product) the StorPool_(storage). There are a lot of examples for the second approach like: Nexenta-NexentaStor, EMC-ScaleIo, DataCore-VirtualSan, etc? There are more legitimate links like OpenNebula's addons page, OpenNebula's TechDays, the participation on WHD global, etc, that are buried few levels deep in Google (thanks to the SEO) that could be used properly. Ant70wiki (talk) 21:55, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links are broken

Some external links point to low credibility sources, some are in Russian (?) so have no reason to be in English Wikipedia. 95.133.98.192 (talk) 10:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

95.133.98.192 Yaniardiyanto0 (talk) 14:12, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible spam?

Article was written as spam by account created only to write this article. No other contributions to Wikipedia are on his history page. 95.133.98.192 (talk) 10:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, as noted above, not sure this would survive a notability challenge. At the least it needs clean up, since it uses the term distributed storage which is about a clustered file system, but this seems more like virtualization on the disk block level, not file system level? W Nowicki (talk) 00:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]