Talk:Stop!! Hibari-kun!/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contribs) 01:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

@Juhachi: Just a short comment before anything else: no separate section regarding the manga and anime's development? Almost all, if not all of our Good Articles on anime and manga have at least a short section on development and releases; right now, the development is limited to the manga section. Otherwise, the article is well-written (as expected of your work), and given the series' age, the depth of sources is respectable. This is almost a pass, I just need some feedback regarding my comments. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

The development of the manga is incorporated in the manga section because I felt it would be better all together with the release info. This is not unlike recent GAs like No Game No Life and The Irregular at Magic High School which incorporate the development of the primary media together with the release info (notice how I also adopted the formatting of the characters from those articles, too). Also, considering its age, there was very little I could find related to the anime beyond the staff and a couple of DVD releases; I think one of the sources in reception touched on the anime within the source, but all the rest only talked about the manga. If any development info for the anime ever existed (like why did a series like this even get an anime in the first place, which I would personally like to know), it was probably in magazines published back in the 80s, long lost to time.--十八 03:22, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

@Juhachi: I see. This reminds me of the GAN that The Princess in the Birdcage Kingdom had, where no sources could be found for development and release, and thus I regretfully had to fail it. But this time, you were able to address the issue of sourcing, so I am pleased to inform you that this GAN is a pass. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:50, 4 May 2016 (UTC)