Talk:Stoked (TV series)

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: Canadian / Television / Web Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Canadian animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Web animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

I removed that silly link to that Allie and Alison show because it does not exist. It's a fake story that involves characters from the Danny Phantom universe. The way I know it's fake is because;

- Butch Hartman has confirmed that it's fake. That's enough proof right there but let's go on.

- Nickelodeon owns Danny Phantom and they have not mentioned the show. The links always say Fresh TV and no mention of Nick.

- The animation is obviously fan made.

- There's no supporting links to prove that it exists.

VANDALISM!?

DAMN IT! Stop vandalizing this show is for Teletoon and Cartoon Network not for Fox that's it I want iut protected stat! Matthew Cantrell (talk) 00:46, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reef's nickname

His real name may be Charles Reefton and he goes by Reef. He doesn't have any teeth missing from his mouth if you look at his smile you'll see all his teeth. Matthew Cantrell (talk) 17:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a popular rumor that Reef's actual name is Leslie, as a reference to the unaired episode's title, A Boy Named Leslie. No other character's real name on Stoked but Reef's is yet to be reveal--69.132.159.33 (talk) 00:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Episode List

I just finished adding a 2nd episode list. it no longer says 12 (Can)/ 14 (USA). Getting to my point, however, do you think they should be organized by USA episode order or CAN episode order.

I would say Canada order since it's a canadian cartoon, but while editing it i noticed it was in USA order. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.3.141.210 (talk) 23:14, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who plays Reef

Can it be officially verified (that is, by Fresh TV or by Teletoon) if Terry McGurrin actually does voice Reef on Stoked? Creativity-II (talk) 05:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Terry McGurrin voices Reef, one source is IMDB.- Space Commander Plasma (talk) 00:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Season

Where's the reference for the 2nd season that it's confirmed or anything? No info whatsoever. I'm undoing it. Somebody can change it when there's reference. Kailaz (talk) 05:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stoked page protection level

Whoever is the admin or capible of changing the protection level, so that unregister users do not vandalize the Stoked page. (Space Commander Plasma (talk) 04:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Quality of writing

This is close to being one of the worst written articles I have ever read in an encyclopaedia. Apart from some sloppy phrasing, it is full of slang that is out of place in a serious reference work, eg. "trash-talk", "laid back" (and "laid-back"), "a huge crush", "kook", etc etc. We read that "Lo's life has been that of a spoiled princess". (What? Really?) The widespread use of informal vocabulary such as "mom" and "kids" is not appropriate to an encyclopaedia - "mother" and "childen" are perfectly good words. Contractions (it's, don't) have no place in serious writing. (I have dealt with these.) In addition, the character descriptions are far too long and almost entirely unreferenced, displaying unacceptable elements of original research. Frankly, the whole thing reads like a fan magazine article, and a badly written one at that, rather than an encyclopaedic reference. Emeraude (talk) 14:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this article could use a little more fine-tuning in terms of writing style, but the info contained in the article was obtained by previous editors by checking the Teletoon website's Stoked page and by watching episodes of the show, so it can hardly be considered "unreferenced" or having original research. Perhaps the inclusion of verifying references similar to these ones in the List of 6teen characters article could be helpful toward improving the article. Creativity-II (talk) 06:45, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]