Talk:Stockjobber

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

List of Stockjobbers in 1986

I'm not sure where to look it up but, from memory, shouldn't "the leading jobbing firms were" read "the only jobbing firms were"? Smith Brothers had become Smith New Court by then, too. JohnHarris (talk) 18:33, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Derogatory Term?

I have found a few sources from the 19th century using the term "stock jobber" somewhat derogatory - like a lazy gambler. I will try to get some things together, but can any others confirm the term as derogatory? --Toast and Friends (talk) 12:02, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]