Talk:Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Death Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2018 and 5 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ggrriefefnien.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedic?

Really? Do we need a whole article about a single book? I suggest we merge this into the article on its author, Mary Roach. ~ Reaverdrop 07:35, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have already proposed on the Mary Roach page that we unmerge it. That is, we restore this article about the book. You say that such an article would not be "encyclopedic," but one could also say that the article on Mary Roach is not "encyclopedic" because it would not appear on any standard encyclopedia. However, the beauty of Wikipedia lies in its scope, so I see no reason we cannot have two articles. What precedent in the style guide can you cite? ~ JianLi 23:33, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. If we can have articles about a film or even a single pop song, I see no reason why we cannot have articles about a single book, as long as the book in question is not self-published or published through a vanity press. Especially a notable book like this does deserve its own detailed article. A book's notability is not restricted to those so-called classics, like Alice in the Wonderland or Pride and Prejudice, but also those that exerted a significant influence in the academic world or that are given a bestseller status.

Having said that, this article does need some expansion badly. My suggestion is that we give a summary about each chapter. --BorgQueen 06:51, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]