Talk:Stewie Kills Lois and Lois Kills Stewie/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk) 23:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I think Family Guy jumped the shark after airing "The Juice Is Loose". But these two episodes are classics.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- In the lead, I think it should fully read "Lois Griffin" and that Peter is her husband, and Stewie is her (baby genius) son.
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- ref 2 puts equals' in the retrievel date (YY=MM=DD) instead of hyphens (YY-MM-DD) like it should be; change it.
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- I think it should say how many viewers it received when each episode aired, with Nielsan ratings and demographic.
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Looks okay.
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- No edit wars.
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- I think there should be a screenshot of the episode, but whatever.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- I guess it's good enough to be a good article, just minor problems that can be quickly fixed. So I'm passing this article. Well done!
- Pass or Fail:
