Talk:Stevia/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

It appears that there are some reference problems. Some, especially the first few, are poorly formatted. In addition, please address the tagged concerns of reference problems. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 05:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed up the malformed citations. There is still one issue left with citation #5. The text is factual but the citation doesn't adequately support it. =Axlq 06:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by that in your last sentence? OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 18:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article had two tags, one about malformed citations and one about citations not supporting the text. I cleaned up the citation formatting and removed one tag. The talk page refers to a citation #6 that doesn't support the text (now #5 as a result of me merging two). That citation still doesn't support the text. However, the statement cited is a true and verifiable statement. I have not yet replaced citation #5 with a better one. Once that happens, it should fix the problems discussed on the talk page. I didn't have time last night (it was late) and I don't have time now (I'm going out in a couple minutes). =Axlq 18:56, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed the concerns about sources stated on the talk page from March 2009, and I have removed the final cite check tag from the article. The article should now be back up to GA quality again. =Axlq 03:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done This article is kept as GA. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 03:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]