Talk:Steven Marshall

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: South Australia / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Steven Marshall is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Image source/license

Can someone more familiar with image sourcing check the image out? It looks like a photo of a photo or a scan of a photo. Timeshift (talk) 07:14, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Timeshift, I sourced the photo. What is wrong with it? It looks OK to me. Philiashasspots (talk) 05:00, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"I sourced the photo."...? That's rather unusual language. How and where did you source it? Timeshift (talk) 00:43, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I phoned up Steven Marshall's electoral office and asked them for a head shot photo they could give me to put on WikiPedia. They emailed me one. Is that OK? Philiashasspots (talk) 03:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Such acceptable images license examples can be found here (OTRS) and here (creative commons). These are examples of what are required for images of living persons. It removes the potential for fraudulence. Timeshift (talk) 07:39, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per another user's template in the image, "Unless permission is granted, the file can be speedy deleted seven days after this template was added (27 April 2013) and the uploader was notified". Timeshift (talk) 02:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As another contributor has deleted the image, I have removed the link from this article. Timeshift (talk) 11:46, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

15% two-party swing to Labor at St Peters booth

Interesting. And a majority of Liberal seats (12 of 22) swung on two-party to Labor: Adelaide, Dunstan, Davenport, Unley, Heysen, Waite, Goyder, Kavel, Schubert, Hammond, Bragg and Chaffey. Ashford, Mawson, Ramsay, Croydon also swung to Labor. I've done some preliminary checks and Evans, Redmond and Chapman had suffered large non-trend two-party swings of around 8-12% in some booths which i've added to their articles. I've not done it yet on this article because of the rather stubby nature of the leader of the opposition's article and don't want it to look biased. But in an expanded article it would work. Timeshift (talk) 05:55, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Premier of South Australia section content

Shouldn’t this be a brief summary of key occurrences and decisions made during the Ministry? Boscaswell talk 02:15, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]